Is mobsf affected by CVE-2025-31116?

PyPI mobsf is affected in <4.3.2.

Is CVE-2025-31116 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 0.4%.

medium

CVE-2025-31116

Q: Is CVE-2025-31116 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 0.4%.

PyPI · mobsf

Summary

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) has a SSRF Vulnerability fix bypass on assetlinks_check with DNS Rebinding

Severity: medium
EPSS: 0.4% (p33)
Also known as: GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56, PYSEC-2025-48
Published: 2025-03-31

References

https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/security/advisories/GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31116
https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/commit/4b8bab5a9858c69fe13be4631b82d82186e0d3bd

Related advisories

CVE-2026-24490 — high · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2024-54000 — high · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2025-24805 — high · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2025-24804 — high · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2025-24803 — high · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2026-33545 — medium · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2025-58162 — medium · PyPI/mobsf
CVE-2025-46730 — medium · PyPI/mobsf

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.