Is langflow affected by CVE-2026-0770?

PyPI langflow is affected in <=1.7.3.

Is CVE-2026-0770 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 10.4%.

high

CVE-2026-0770

Q: Is CVE-2026-0770 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 10.4%.

PyPI · langflow

Summary

Langflow affected by Remote Code Execution via validate_code() exec()

Severity: high
EPSS: 10.4% (p95)
Also known as: GHSA-g22f-v6f7-2hrh
Published: 2026-01-23

References

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0770
https://github.com/affix/CVE-2026-0770-PoC
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow

Related advisories

CVE-2026-55450 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2026-48519 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2026-42048 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2026-33873 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2026-33309 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2026-33017 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2026-27966 — critical · PyPI/langflow
CVE-2025-34291 — critical · PyPI/langflow

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.