Is wwbn/avideo affected by CVE-2026-40928?

Packagist wwbn/avideo is affected in <=29.0.

Is CVE-2026-40928 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 0.1%.

medium

CVE-2026-40928

Q: Is CVE-2026-40928 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 0.1%.

Packagist · wwbn/avideo

Summary

WWBN AVideo: Missing CSRF Protection on State-Changing JSON Endpoints Enables Forced Comment Creation, Vote Manipulation, and Category Asset Deletion

Severity: medium
EPSS: 0.1% (p2)
Also known as: GHSA-x2pw-9c38-cp2j
Published: 2026-04-14

References

Related advisories

CVE-2026-40911 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-33867 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-33716 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-33502 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-33478 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-33352 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-33351 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo
CVE-2026-29058 — critical · Packagist/wwbn/avideo

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.