Is rustls-webpki affected by GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4?

crates.io rustls-webpki is affected in >=0.102.0-alpha.0 =0.104.0-alpha.1 <0.104.0-alpha.5.

Is GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is not available.

medium

GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4

Q: Is GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is not available.

crates.io · rustls-webpki

Summary

webpki: CRLs not considered authoritative by Distribution Point due to faulty matching logic

Severity: medium
Also known as: RUSTSEC-2026-0049
Published: 2026-03-20

References

https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4
https://github.com/rustls/webpki
https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0049.html

Related advisories

GHSA-82j2-j2ch-gfr8 — high · crates.io/rustls-webpki
GHSA-fh2r-99q2-6mmg — high · crates.io/rustls-webpki
GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh — medium · crates.io/rustls-webpki
GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5 — medium · crates.io/rustls-webpki

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.