Comparaison

Stateward vs Aikido

Aikido and Stateward share a goal: collapse a pile of point tools into one layer with low noise. Aikido does this by aggregating and de-duplicating many open-source scanners behind one dashboard. Stateward does it with a single reasoning engine that understands your codebase as a graph and adversarially validates findings, which is what lets it catch cross-file and merge-induced issues the underlying scanners cannot see individually.

CapacitéStatewardAikido
Consolidates SAST + SCA + secrets + IaCYesYes
Noise reduction / triageAdversarial validation + reachabilityAggregation & de-dup of scanners
Whole-codebase knowledge base (call graph)YesNo
Merge-induced & cross-branch flawsYesNo
Multi-agent adversarial deep audit with reproductionsYesNo
AI-generated-code auditing as a first-class targetYesPartial
Cloud posture (CSPM)Code, deps, secrets focusYes
Inline PR review with one-click fixYesYes
EU-sovereign hosting (Citadea)Yes, by defaultEU region available
Free tierYesYes

Positionné au niveau catégorie et volontairement honnête. Aikido est un bon outil — voir ci-dessous où il l’emporte.

Quand Aikido est plus adapté

Aikido is a strong choice if you want cloud-posture management (CSPM) in the same dashboard, prefer a tool built on familiar open-source scanners you can reason about, or need the broadest surface coverage out of the box for a small team today.

Conçu pour mériter votre confiance

Lecture seule & éphémère

Stateward commente, sans jamais pousser, fusionner ou stocker vos clés.

Hébergement souverain UE

Code et données restent hébergés en UE via Citadea — pensé pour NIS2, DORA et le CRA.

Conscient de tout le code

Raisonne sur le graphe d’appels et les frontières de confiance, pas seulement le diff.

Stateward est en bêta et recrute des partenaires de conception. Conçu par Yggdrasil Digital.