medium

GHSA-f66q-9rf6-8795

PyPI · Flask-Security-Too

Summary

Flask-Security-Too: WebAuthn reauthentication freshness bypass via cross-user assertion

Severity
medium
CWE
CWE-287, CWE-863
Published
2026-07-07
Updated
2026-07-07

Advisory details

Summary

Flask-Security-Too 5.8.0 and 5.8.1 mark a session as reauthentication-fresh after processing a WebAuthn assertion whose proven credential belongs to a different user than the currently authenticated session user. The check that GHSA-97r5-pg8x-p63p added on the OAuth reauthentication path (user.email == current_user.email) is missing on the WebAuthn reauthentication path. An attacker who owns any WebAuthn credential registered to any account on the deployment can satisfy a victim session's freshness gate by submitting their own WebAuthn proof into the victim session.

Affected versions

Flask-Security-Too >= 5.8.0, <= 5.8.1 (current main commit 5c44c76e33a20b67d02115e26d2da4bab18c094e). GHSA-97r5-pg8x-p63p (published 2026-05-22) shipped its fix in 5.8.1 only on oauth_glue.py; webauthn.py was not touched and remains exploitable in 5.8.1.

Privilege required

Authenticated attacker on the same Flask-Security deployment, owning at least one WebAuthn credential of any usage (first / secondary / verify) that is registered to their own account. The attacker also needs the ability to drive HTTP requests against the WebAuthn endpoints inside the victim session (e.g. a separate gadget such as CSRF + cookie-based auth, an XSS that doesn't reach the cookie itself but can move the session through endpoints, or an existing session-fixation gadget; or the rarer but easier case of an attacker who has direct access to the victim's not-yet-fresh session via a shared browser). The point of the freshness gate is to defend exactly that "I have the session but it isn't fresh enough to do sensitive things" position, so any context in which freshness would have protected the victim is also the context in which this bypass matters.

Vulnerable code

flask_security/webauthn.py:846-889 (commit 5c44c76e33a20b67d02115e26d2da4bab18c094e):

@auth_required(lambda: cv("API_ENABLED_METHODS"))
def webauthn_verify_response(token: str) -> ResponseValue:
    form = t.cast(
        WebAuthnSigninResponseForm, build_form_from_request("wan_signin_response_form")
    )

    expired, invalid, state = check_and_get_token_status(
        token, "wan", get_within_delta("WAN_SIGNIN_WITHIN")
    )
    ...
    form.challenge = state["challenge"]
    form.user_verification = state["user_verification"]
    form.is_secondary = False
    form.is_verify = True

    if form.validate_on_submit():
        # update last use and sign count
        after_this_request(view_commit)
        assert form.cred
        assert form.user
        form.cred.lastuse_datetime = _security.datetime_factory()
        form.cred.sign_count = form.authentication_verification.new_sign_count
        _datastore.put(form.cred)

        # verified - so set freshness time.
        session["fs_paa"] = time.time()
        ...

flask_security/webauthn.py:276-308 (the form's validate()):

def validate(self, **kwargs: t.Any) -> bool:
    if not super().validate(**kwargs):
        return False  # pragma: no cover
    ...
    try:
        auth_cred = parse_authentication_credential_json(self.credential.data)
    except (...):
        ...
        return False

    # Look up credential Id (raw_id) and user. 7.2.6/7
    self.cred = _datastore.find_webauthn(credential_id=auth_cred.raw_id)
    ...
    # This shouldn't be able to happen if datastore properly cascades delete
    self.user = _datastore.find_user_from_webauthn(self.cred)

self.user is resolved from the attacker-controlled credential_id and is never compared to current_user. The state token issued by _signin_common (webauthn.py:589-622) carries only {challenge, user_verification}, so state tokens are not bound to any user and replay portably across sessions:

def _signin_common(user: UserMixin | None, usage: list[str]) -> tuple[t.Any, str]:
    ...
    state = {
        "challenge": challenge,
        "user_verification": uv,
    }
    ...
    state_token = t.cast(str, _security.wan_serializer.dumps(state))
    return o_json, state_token

Contrast with the patch in oauth_glue.py:211 that GHSA-97r5-pg8x-p63p shipped:

next_loc = session.pop("fs_oauth_next", None)
if user and user.email == current_user.email:
    # verified - so set freshness time.
    session["fs_paa"] = time.time()

That user.email == current_user.email clamp is the missing check on the WebAuthn side.

How input reaches the sink

  1. Attacker logs in to their own account and registers their own WebAuthn credential (call it cred_attacker). They retain a copy of any valid navigator.credentials.get() assertion JSON produced by their authenticator (one signature is enough; can also be produced fresh on demand per request).
  2. Attacker holds, or gets, a victim session in a state where fs_paa is past FRESHNESS. The victim is authenticated as themselves; the gate stops them from invoking freshness-protected business endpoints (/change, /change-username, /wf-add, /us-setup, anything decorated with @auth_required(within=...)).
  3. The victim session calls POST /wan-verify and receives a wan_state token. The state token has no user binding.
  4. Attacker submits an assertion that proves possession of cred_attacker, inside the victim session, to POST /wan-verify/<wan_state>.
  5. WebAuthnSigninResponseForm.validate resolves form.user to the attacker account from find_user_from_webauthn(self.cred), signs/verifies the assertion against the (attacker-controlled) public key it stored at registration time, and returns True. The user-handle check on auth_cred.response.user_handle (if present) compares against self.user.fs_webauthn_user_handle, i.e. it compares attacker user-handle to attacker user, so it passes trivially.
  6. webauthn_verify_response then writes session["fs_paa"] = time.time(). The session user is unchanged (still the victim) but the freshness clock is reset by a cryptographic proof of the attacker's authenticator.
  7. Any subsequent @auth_required(within=...) endpoint now succeeds inside the victim session.

End-to-end reproduction

Reproduction is an in-process Flask test client driving the published wheel (pip install Flask-Security-Too==5.8.0, also re-run against 5.8.1 since GHSA-97r5-pg8x-p63p's fix shipped with that release only touched oauth_glue.py). The full transcript is in the Proof of concept section below; here is the boot recipe:

python3.12 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip install --quiet 'Flask-Security-Too==5.8.0' Flask-SQLAlchemy webauthn email-validator argon2_cffi
python poc.py

Captured run-time output (5.8.0 path):

=== Submit BOB's WebAuthn assertion to Alice's /wan-verify-response ===
  cross-user assertion status: 200
  alice fs_uniquifier in session AFTER: '408245d132bc4213a55606c46f40e038'   # still Alice
  fs_paa BEFORE: 1779582282.550872
  fs_paa AFTER : 1779585882.615287                                            # advanced
=== Demonstrate impact: /sensitive (freshness-protected) accepted ===
  /sensitive after cross-user verify status: 200

Re-run against 5.8.1 produces the same 200 on the cross-user assertion and the same 200 on the freshness-gated endpoint, confirming that the patch for GHSA-97r5-pg8x-p63p did not extend to the WebAuthn path.

Proof of concept

Mocked WebAuthn fixtures (REG_DATA_UV, SIGNIN_DATA_UV, REG_DATA1

References

Related advisories

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPTClaudePerplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.