No seat tax. No per-repo anxiety.

It is a flaw that exists in neither branch on its own but appears when two branches merge, for example one branch adds a handler that forwards a user-controlled URL while another quietly drops an allowlist, and together they create an SSRF. Per-PR scanners miss it because each diff looks safe. Stateward reasons over the prospective merged state of the codebase, so it flags the interaction before it reaches your default branch.

The worst vulnerabilities rarely live in a single diff. A change that looks harmless can pipe user input into an unsafe function defined in another file, or reach a sink through a chain of calls a line-by-line scanner never sees. Stateward builds a knowledge base of the whole project, call graph, trust boundaries and dependency reachability, so it analyses the change in the context that actually determines whether it is exploitable.

Every candidate finding is validated before you see it: results are deduplicated across engines, strengthened when independent agents converge on the same issue, then attacked adversarially, can it actually be reached and triggered, what is the real impact. Weak claims are dropped and only severity-rated findings with a reproduction are posted, scoped to your diff, not a 4,000-item backlog.

Stateward unifies SAST, dependency auditing, secret detection, AI-generated-code review and compliance mapping into one autonomous layer, then triages and deduplicates across all of them so you get fixes, not a wall of red. It is built from day one for AI-written code and hosted on EU infrastructure with EU data residency.

Yes, that is the category it was built for. Stateward targets the failure patterns specific to Copilot-, Cursor- and Claude-written code: insecure defaults, over-permissive configs, hallucinated or typosquatted dependencies, and prompt-injection surfaces no legacy scanner was trained to catch.

No. Findings are scoped to the lines you changed, deduplicated across every engine, ranked by real exploitability, and re-pushes update the existing review instead of posting duplicates. You set the minimum severity and ignore paths per repo.

It has read-only access, granted through your provider’s OAuth, it can comment but never push, merge or alter code. Stateward never stores your credentials, and code is analysed in an isolated, short-lived environment that is discarded once the review is posted.

Today your code is processed on sovereign EU infrastructure with EU data residency, so your code, findings and security data stay inside EU jurisdiction.

Nothing breaks. Stateward is read-only and adds nothing to your pipeline, removing it is one click and you’re exactly where you started. Analysis runs on open engines, not a proprietary black box, and we offer source & continuity escrow so the engine is always maintainable.

Deterministic scanning is free on every tier. The AI analysis is metered in credits, where one credit is one dollar. Open source and solo devs are free: every public repo gets free deterministic scanning, open-source projects can request a sponsored AI-analysis grant by emailing hello@stateward.com, and private repos get a monthly credit grant. Teams are $40/month for a credit allowance plus the platform; enterprise is custom. No seats, no per-repo counting, no credit card to start.

Neither. Your bill never grows because you hired, because a bot pushed code, or because you split a service into more repositories. You pay a small subscription plus credits for the AI analysis you actually use, and the deterministic scanners are always free.

Install the app on GitHub or GitLab and grant read-only access to the repos you choose. There is no pipeline to rebuild, Stateward reviews your next pull request automatically.

It gives teams that could never staff an AppSec function the coverage of one, and it makes existing security teams faster by handling the repetitive review, triage and evidence work. It supports human judgement, it does not replace it.