Résumé

Coraza: URL-encoded form Content-Type parameters bypass Coraza body inspection

Détails de l’avis

Summary

Coraza fails to inspect URL-encoded form bodies when their valid Content-Type contains a media-type parameter, for example:

Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8

An unauthenticated attacker can use this header to hide the complete form body from custom Coraza rules that inspect ARGS_POST or REQUEST_BODY, while the bundled Go HTTP middleware forwards the body and the backend parses it normally.

This is a deterministic request-body inspection bypass. Suggested severity: Medium. Current OWASP CRS includes rule 901340, which forces fallback inspection and mitigates this path; this report does not claim a bypass of an unmodified current CRS ruleset

Details

The affected component is request-body processor selection in internal/corazawaf/transaction.go.

Transaction.AddRequestHeader compares the complete lowercased header value using exact equality:

case "content-type":
    val := strings.ToLower(value)
    if val == "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" {
        tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("URLENCODED")
    } else if strings.HasPrefix(val, "multipart/form-data") {
        tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("MULTIPART")
    }

Source: internal/corazawaf/transaction.go, lines 383-390.

The media type of application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8 remains application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset is a parameter. Because Coraza compares the entire header, the comparison fails and REQBODY_PROCESSOR remains empty.

ProcessRequestBody treats the empty processor as success:

rbp = strings.ToLower(rbp)
if rbp == "" {
    tx.WAF.Rules.Eval(types.PhaseRequestBody, tx)
    return tx.interruption, nil
}

Source: internal/corazawaf/transaction.go, lines 1115-1120.

Coraza therefore evaluates phase 2 without parsing the body and without setting REQBODY_ERROR. The URL-encoded processor that normally populates ARGS_POST, REQUEST_BODY, and REQUEST_BODY_LENGTH is never invoked.

The bundled middleware buffers and reconstructs the full request body before invoking the backend. The backend consequently receives data that was absent from Coraza's body variables.

The issue exists in the standard compiled implementation; no special build tag is required. Request-body access defaults to Off in an empty configuration, but Coraza's recommended configuration enables it with SecRequestBodyAccess On.

PoC

Save this self-contained test as parameterized_form_bypass_test.go in the Coraza repository root:

package coraza_test

import (
    "net/http"
    "net/http/httptest"
    "strings"
    "testing"

    coraza "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3"
    corazahttp "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/http"
)

func TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass(t *testing.T) {
    cfg := coraza.NewWAFConfig().WithDirectives(`
SecRuleEngine On
SecRequestBodyAccess On
SecRule ARGS_POST:cmd "@streq evil" "id:910001,phase:2,deny,status:403,t:none"
`)

    waf, err := coraza.NewWAF(cfg)
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatal(err)
    }

    backendSaw := ""
    handler := corazahttp.WrapHandler(waf, http.HandlerFunc(
        func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
            if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
                t.Fatal(err)
            }
            backendSaw = r.PostForm.Get("cmd")
            w.WriteHeader(http.StatusNoContent)
        },
    ))

    req := httptest.NewRequest(
        http.MethodPost,
        "http://example.test/",
        strings.NewReader("cmd=evil"),
    )
    req.Header.Set(
        "Content-Type",
        "application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8",
    )

    rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
    handler.ServeHTTP(rec, req)

    if rec.Code != http.StatusNoContent {
        t.Fatalf("expected request to reach backend, status=%d", rec.Code)
    }
    if backendSaw != "evil" {
        t.Fatalf("backend did not receive malicious value: %q", backendSaw)
    }
}

Run:

go test . -run TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass -v

Observed:

=== RUN   TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass
--- PASS: TestParameterizedFormInspectionBypass (0.00s)
PASS

The test passes only when Coraza fails to return its configured 403 response and the backend parses cmd=evil.

As a control, change the header to:

Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

Coraza then selects the URL-encoded processor, exposes cmd=evil as ARGS_POST:cmd, and returns 403 before the backend runs.

Impact

This is a parser differential and request-body inspection bypass affecting applications protected by custom Coraza rules.

An unauthenticated attacker can add charset=UTF-8 to an ordinary form request. Coraza then runs phase-2 rules without the submitted parameters and reports no body-processing failure, while the application receives and processes those parameters.

Rules relying on these variables are affected on this path:

  • ARGS_POST
  • ARGS for POST-derived values
  • ARGS_POST_NAMES
  • ARGS_NAMES
  • REQUEST_BODY
  • REQUEST_BODY_LENGTH

This defeats custom rules intended to reject injection strings, dangerous commands, or forbidden business values in form fields. The final application impact depends on the backend behavior that the bypassed rule was intended to protect.

Affected operators are those who enable request-body access and rely on automatic URL-encoded parsing without current CRS rule 901340, ctl:forceRequestBodyVariable=On, an explicitly forced processor, or equivalent backend validation.

The fix is to parse Content-Type according to MIME syntax and compare the normalized media type without parameters, for example with Go's mime.ParseMediaType. If an expected body has no processor, Coraza should expose an explicit processing error instead of silently evaluating phase 2 with empty variables.

Follow-up (2026-09-30): duplicate Content-Type headers desynchronize processor selection from the parsed body

The original fix made body-processor selection tolerant of media-type parameters (charset=UTF-8 etc.) by switching from exact equality to strings.HasPrefix. A second, distinct gap was found while reviewing that same selection code: it never accounted for a request carrying more than one Content-Type header.

Root cause

Transaction.AddRequestHeader is called once per header by the integrator (documented contract). Its content-type case runs on every call:

case "content-type":
    val := strings.ToLower(value)
    if strings.HasPrefix(val, "application/x-www-form-urlencoded") {
        tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("URLENCODED")
    } else if strings.HasPrefix(val, "multipart/form-data") {
        tx.variables.reqbodyProcessor.Set("MULTIPART")
    }

A request with two Content-Type headers therefore has its body-processor selection silently overwritten by the last one, since each call unconditionally calls Set. Meanwhile, ProcessRequestBody extracts the mimeType it passes to whichever processor gets selected from requestHeaders.Get("content-type")[0] -- the first value (internal/corazawaf/transaction.go, a few hundred lines below AddRequestHeader) -- and Go's net/http Header.Get (what a typical backend uses) also returns only the first value. So selection follows the last header while everything else follows t

Références