medium

CVE-2026-84380

PyPI · httpx2

Summary

HTTPX2: Conflicting Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers can be auto-generated

Severity
medium
CVSS
5.6
EPSS
0.2% (p13)
CWE
CWE-444
Also known as
GHSA-pf96-p4fj-6566
Published
2026-09-08
Updated
2026-09-08

Advisory details

Summary

HTTPX2 can automatically add a Content-Length header to a request that already contains a caller-supplied Transfer-Encoding header. The resulting HTTP/1.1 request contains both framing headers, which can create an ambiguous message boundary and enable request smuggling or connection desynchronization when processed by intermediaries that disagree about which header takes precedence.

Details

When a request body has a known size, HTTPX2's content encoder returns a default Content-Length. Request._prepare() applies each default header with setdefault(), which only checks whether that same header is already present. It does not check whether the mutually exclusive Transfer-Encoding header is present.

For example:

import httpx2

request = httpx2.Request(
    "POST",
    "http://example.com/",
    headers={"Transfer-Encoding": "chunked"},
    content=b"test 123",
)

print(request.headers)

The request contains both:

Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Length: 8

On an HTTP/1.1 connection, the body is serialized using chunked transfer coding while both headers are sent on the wire. This violates HTTP message-framing requirements. Fixed-size byte, JSON, form, and known-length multipart bodies can reach the affected path.

Streaming bodies with an explicit Content-Length are not affected in current HTTPX2 releases because the automatically generated Transfer-Encoding is already suppressed in that direction.

Impact

An attacker may be able to use the conflicting framing headers as a request-smuggling or desynchronization primitive. Exploitation requires an application to pass attacker-controlled request framing headers and associated body data to HTTPX2, use HTTP/1.1, and communicate through a proxy or origin that accepts conflicting headers and interprets them differently from another hop.

Depending on the downstream infrastructure, successful exploitation could interfere with requests sharing a persistent connection, bypass front-end routing or authorization decisions, or poison responses or caches. Applications that do not forward attacker-controlled Transfer-Encoding headers are not directly exposed.

Mitigation

Upgrade to HTTPX2 2.11.0 or later. Patched versions treat Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding as mutually exclusive when applying automatically generated request headers.

If upgrading is not immediately possible, remove Transfer-Encoding and other hop-by-hop framing headers from untrusted input before constructing outbound requests. Applications acting as proxies should derive outbound framing from the body rather than forwarding inbound Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding headers.

References

Related advisories

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPTClaudePerplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.